|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Discourse Concerning Occurrence And Flow At Crisis Situations:In the Context of Humans and Systems
|
|
Ana Sayfa > Seçtiğiniz Site Kısmı > XIV. IFTA DÜNYA AİLE TERAPİSİ KONGRESİ > PLENARIES > |
|
|
|
By being in continuation, without interruption, with the true and valid form of information concerning humans, the emphasis is on serving more through straightforward follow-up and intervention rather than being in administration of various tenets. In one way or the other, it is a concern to stay at the position where the anonymous information present in all of these approaches is subject to the slightest meaning and definition deviation. In this approach, together with emphasizing on being constructivist, to be able to be operational is essential for the mild effectiveness of being pragmatic and experiential. The point at issue may be using the definition of multiple reality rather than multiple perspectives and being in attainment/realization of multiple reality; pursuit and orientation of the flow and watching for the flow of the anonymous definition concerning reality, rather than the endeavor to determine/assign what the actual reality is. Rather than the therapeutic theoretical and the clinical framework of structural determinism and its disruption of the pragmatic effectiveness of therapeutic ability; we earn the benefits in various places, forms, qualities and quantities from the spectrum developing from determinism through pragmatism under the direction of pragmatic truth; this is fundamental. Indeed the occurrence and the flow/course do not change; their definition and attainment/realization changes. The appearances of situations are not by chance; they continue on their own. In the occurrence of being cosmic, all social and biological systems process/work by the same systemic rules. Within this loop the same rules are applicable to being destructive as much as being healthy. Therefore, the reality/actuality of these cosmic rules and their differentiation of operation, can be seen more clearly and be more comprehensible at the point where people do not feel well. What we call “recovery” is the system's deserving to continue itself, a system not being destructive to itself or the environment if possible, and being productive and creative. From our point of view as the outsider; since nature does not contain discriminations such as good-bad, justified-unjustified, right-wrong, faulty-flawless, moral-immoral; when we use similar definitions, indeed we in our system can be on any or all sides relative to the other system. The location of power in the system is present within the service for the wholeness and continuation of occurrence and flow; on the other hand emotion, in mutual interaction with power, among systemic and individual-systemic motives, is able to transport itself with a mild quality. What has to be done can be done, however the attainment/realization of other realities is necessary because what is “the other” reality for us is “fundamental” reality for the other. Human actions like war, political strains and terrorism are operating and being treated according to the basis of multiple realities. In that context, because family, couple and the individual are affected by systemic destructive occurrence at various depths, achieving the opportunity to treat and protect them can only be possible through this point of view
|
|
|
|
|